|
Ethical Clothing
This article will examine the edges and
boundaries of thinking about what constitutes
ethical clothing. For each of us, our ethics are
personal, subjective and changing.
One way to review your thoughts is to examine the
edges and boundaries surrounding ethical shopping
and ethical clothing for what makes sense to you
and what might challenge your views and feelings.
Proponents of veganism have been challenging views
about ethical clothing and ethical eating for
millennium. The term ‘vegan’ (from VEGetariAN) was
coined in November 1944 at the founding of The
Vegan Society in London by six non-dairy
vegetarians. The underlying concept of “promoting
ways of living free of animal products for the
benefit of people, animals and the environment”
has been found in many sects throughout history
and cultures. To avoid taking a life, some yogis
in ancient India would eat only old, dried grasses
and refused to eat vegetables and plants that had
been sacrificed on the cook’s chopping block.
Closely aligned with animal rights, veganism is
promoted as a cruelty-free lifestyle that does not
exploit animals in any way. Vegans do not eat
eggs, dairy products including milk, honey or a
wide variety of products derived from animals and
insects for health reasons and because they
believe that using these products exploits other
species. Vegan clothing does not use leather
(because leather can only come from a dead
animal), wool (because raising and shearing sheep
is sometimes exploitive and cruel), down (because
of the harsh way that down feathers are plucked
from live geese), or silk (because silk comes from
the cocoons of silkworms which are killed when the
silkworm cocoon and the larva inside are dropped
in boiling water to unravel the silkworm cocoon
for silk fiber).
Scientific research suggesting that plants have
awareness, consciousness, rudimentary emotions and
feel pain has many vegans performing contorted
grammatical parsing about the meaning of
“cruelty-free”. There is no reason to believe that
plants are life forms any less deserving of
respect than other life forms which share this
planet. Many vegan justifications for eating
vegetables, even though plants obviously have
awareness and are sensitive to their environment,
begin to sound remarkably similar to meat-eaters
justifications for munching on Ol' Bossy.
Wool is avoided by many vegans because of a
practice called mulesing on young lambs in
Australia and because of animal rights concerns
about the raising of animals being exploitive.
Mulesing is the nasty practice of cutting away the
folds of skin, without the use of anesthetics,
around the anal area of sheep to prevent flies
from laying eggs (which become maggots) in these
folds of skin. The fly maggots would then infest
and sicken the sheep. This is a problem and
practice unique to Australia. About 25% of the
world’s wool and almost 50% of the fine merino
wool come from Australia. About 60% of the global
wool supply is used in manufacturing clothing.
Responding to pressure from a PeTA campaign
(People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals),
clothing retailers Abercombie & Fitch, Gap Inc,
and Nordstrom began boycotting Australian merino
wool in Fall 2004. The Australian wool industry
agreed to phase out the practice of mulesing in
Australia by 2010.
The manufacturing of wool garments and apparel
from sheep, llamas and alpacas is central to the
economies and livelihoods of many small farmers,
weavers, artisans and textile workers throughout
the world and especially among indigenous peoples
in South America. Small farmers have a tradition
of ethical animal husbandry. Their love and caring
is rooted in a deep appreciation for the symbiotic
relationship that they share with their flocks. To
call the care of many small farmers toward their
flock as being ‘exploitive’ is to be uninformed,
unappreciative of the natural relationships that
exist between species, and slightly arrogant to
assume knowing what is in the heart of peoples
unmet. Boycotting the wool products of many small
farmers and indigenous peoples also needlessly
robs them of the economic means to live a
traditional lifestyle more in harmony with nature.
Vegan ethics are slinking onto the catwalks of
major fashion houses such as the Paris couture
house Chloe and companies in the Gucci Group. Long
time vegetarian and international celebrity
fashion designer Stella McCartney infuses vegan
compassion into her pricey collections and refuses
to design clothing or accessories using leather,
furs or other animal products. An active crusader
in the fight against the maltreatment of animals,
Stella teamed up with PeTA to produce a video
championing animal rights. While staying true to
her principles of fashion with compassion, Stella
McCartney cornered the VH1/Vogue Fashion and Music
Designer of the Year award in 2000. While her
clothes have been coveted for their youthful,
flirty, funky, foxy, feminine, and floaty designs,
Stella McCartney has been working with Adidas on a
new line of women’s running shoe. Big label
running shoes are typically about 50% styling, 50%
engineering and 300% price. Stella’s design
includes an asymmetrical lacing system and a
“muted feminine color scheme including the
signature Stella McCartney color of dusty rose.”
The McCartney Adidas a3 Flyride will be in stores
in May and will sell for a swift $205 … which will
have you panting for breath before you even leave
the store.
In the late 1990’s and early 2000’s, the major
sport shoe companies – Adidas, Nike, Reebok, Fila,
Puma, and ASICS – faced a barrage of public
outrage over the sweatshop conditions in many of
the factories in developing countries which
manufacture sport shoes for these large
corporations. Public pressure, bad press, and
boycotts helped force these large corporations to
acknowledge the labor abuses, such as wages below
a subsistence living, 60+ hour work weeks, no
overtime pay, unhealthy work conditions, poor and
overcrowded living conditions, verbal and sexual
abuse from supervisors, and a lack of any health
benefits.
All of the major sport shoe companies and large
corporations such as Starbucks and Wal-Mart that
have fostered sweatshop conditions in developing
countries have adopted policies and standards that
fall under the wonderfully reassuring umbrella of
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policies to
encourage their manufacturing suppliers to operate
factories that are safe and fair workplaces. These
corporate giants rely on external and internal
auditors to monitor factory labor conditions.
Nike, Adidas and Gang are also members of the Fair
Labor Association which contracts with independent
auditors. Sport shoes are manufactured at hundreds
of factories in China, Vietnam, Cambodia,
Indonesia, Thailand, and other countries where
there is a plentiful supply of cheap, and often
desperate, workers. Monitors and external auditors
have reported that conditions have improved in
many factories but are still far below providing
for a fair, safe and just life for their workers.
The Nikes, Starbucks, Wal-Marts, and Adidas of the
corporate jungle often use their Corporate Social
Responsibility policies to deflect criticism and
to smokescreen their minimal improvements for
impoverished workers. We can only hope that Stella
McCartney will extend her compassion for animal
rights to influence her large sport wear
collaborators to push for more just worker rights.
Stella McCartney is not the only haute couture
designer to incorporate vegan principles in their
fashion with animal compassion. Hemant Trevedi
might not be found in the celebrity spotlights but
he has become a fashion icon in his homeland of
India and his deliciously rich gowns have swept
down the high fashion runways of Munich, Milan,
Paris, Delhi and London. Hemandt Trevedi’s
creations have captured the rich, elaborate, and
complex culture of Indian tradition in timelessly
modern and elegant gowns. His creations have lent
ease and sophistication to Miss India contestants
in Miss World and Miss Universe contests for the
last half dozen years. Hemandt Trevedi is also the
creative consultant at the internationally
recognized Sheetal Design Studio in Mumbai, India.
To my simple eye, his gowns – especially his
wedding gowns – transcend cultures and time giving
an eternal elegance and grace to the wearer.
But perhaps the most provocative (and relevant to
ethical clothing) is Hemandt Trevedi’s Veggie
Collection which he designed for a PeTA campaign.
Long flowing and masculine banana leaves for him,
strategically placed broccoli that flatter the
natural curves for her form the core of this
animal-friendly, cruelty-free (unless you happen
to be a broccoli) collection from Hemandt Trevedi.
At your local Art Museum Charity Ball, you will
provide the center of attention … and also the
munchies if someone else brings the dip. While his
new Veggie Collection might be more appropriate on
the cow trail than the catwalk, it certainly does
have a peel.
The motivation behind his quirky, but totally
eco-friendly and sustainable, green collection for
PeTA’s publicity campaign, was Hemandt Trevedi’s
desire to avoid using any materials, accessories
and fabrics, such as fur, leather, wools, that
might have caused animals to suffer. Upon learning
of the cruel and sometimes illegal trafficking of
cows, buffaloes, goats, sheep and other animals
for their skins, Trevedi renounced his position as
director and choreographer of the fashion show at
the prestigious annual International Leather Fair
in Chennai, India. He also started boycotting the
use of wool when he learned about the cruel
practice of mulesing on sheep. Much of the wool in
India is imported from Australia.
Even
Pamela Anderson – former Playboy Playmate,
Baywatch Babe, deep thinker, home movie buff and
ethical purist – has joined the animal rights and
ethical clothing parade with her new fashion line
of cruelty-free clothing. Pamela Anderson’s
fashion collection consists of non-leather shoes
and Ugg-style boots, sexy all-natural fiber
lingerie, and clothing made without hurting
animals. Anderson is also designing what she calls
“sexy, California-style” sweaters and jeans that
fit snug to the knee and “made to fit a woman’s
body.” Hmmm ... is that a natural or enhanced
body? “It’s basically clothes that I want to
wear,” Pamela confessed. The lettuce-entertain-you
bikini was her design for another PeTA ad
campaign.
While different in their focus, ethical
clothing, organic clothing and sustainable
clothing are united in their fundamental respect
for the earth and all creatures. The ethical
shopper will seek out natural, organic clothing
that was grown or raised lightly and sustainably
upon the earth without poisonous and toxic
pesticides or herbicides, by farm and garment
workers who received a fair and livable wage under
safe and healthy working conditions, using
ecologically-friendly manufacturing processes. And
the easiest way to shop ethically? At your
locally-owned shops or use your mouse … this is
one ‘animal’ that you can exploit without guilt.
|